|
|
|
|
|
January
24, 2002 MEMORANDUM
TO: OPINION
LEADERS FROM:
William Kristol SUBJECT:
A War Budget President Bushs
plan to make increased defense spending a centerpiece of his
2003 federal budget request is good news. Its evidence that the
war on terrorism remains, as it should, the presidents top priority.
I have the responsibility to prepare the nation for what lies ahead,
Bush told the Reserve Officers Association yesterday. The presidents
defense spending plan is a war budget. Not only does it include a $10
billion war reserve, but the balance of the intended increase
is targeted at strengthening the forces needed to fight the war. Other
than a slight rise in spending for missile defense and space systems,
the remaining $38 billion will go primarily for military pay raises, added
health care and retirement costs, maintenance, training, and an increase
in stocks of precision-guided munitions, unmanned reconnaissance drones,
communications gear and other systems that have proved so useful in recent
wars. The clear purpose is to ensure the ability to sustain operations
in Afghanistan and to be ready for Phase Two of the war on terror- including
a move against Iraq. The president is right
to point out that his 2003 request is the largest increase in defense
spending in the last 20 years. Its also true that anything
less would have meant we were not in fact serious about the war on terrorism,
and that defense spending next year will still amount to just over 3.3
percent of our gross domestic product (it was 4.8 percent only a decade
ago). This makes all the more appalling the reaction of Senate Democrats,
for whom this huge defense request provokes heavy skepticism.
Majority Leader Tom Daschle thinks its too early to come to
any conclusion about what the [defense budget] number ought to be.
President Bush has
proposed the minimum budget we need to win the first war of the
21st century (though given the uncertainties of war, he should not
hesitate to ask for more if and when more is required). The Bush request
will also have to be followed up with robust increases in future years
to carry out the needed longer-term program to recapitalize and transform
the U.S. military.
|