|

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
September
15, 2004
MEMORANDUM
TO: OPINION
LEADERS
FROM:
TIM LEHMANN, Assistant Director
SUBJECT:
Kagan on Putin
President Bush today
expressed concern over Russian President Vladimir Putin's decision earlier
this week to abolish direct elections for Russia's regional governors
and to start electing the Russian parliament by party slates more easily
controlled by Moscow. Bush stated that he was "concerned about the
decisions that are being made in Russia that could undermine democracy
in Russia. As governments fight the enemies of democracy, they must uphold
the principles of democracy."
The President is correct to criticize Putin, and should continue to do
so on both strategic and moral grounds, as Project Director Robert Kagan
points out in his op-ed, "Stand
Up to Putin," published in today's Washington Post. Kagan
charges that Putin's recent decision to end popular direct elections in
Russia and to have the Russian parliament elected on the basis of slates
chosen by national party leaders that Putin himself controls "is
an unambiguous step toward tyranny in Russia," a cynical ploy to
consolidate his own political power in the wake of the terrorist attacks
in Beslan.
While it may be popular to believe that Putin is "with us" against
the forces of terrorism, Kagan argues that his betrayal of decent democratic
principles makes it impossible for us to consider him a true ally in prosecuting
the war on terror. As Kagan makes clear, remaining ambivalent vis-à-vis
Putin's authoritarianism would "cast doubt" on America's commitment
to promoting democracy in the Middle East.
In addition, U.S. strategic interests hang in the balance if Putin is
allowed to continue down the path toward tyranny in Russia. As Kagan argues,
"a dictatorial Russia is at least as dangerous to U.S. interests
as a dictatorial Iraq," and can "never be considered a reliable
ally of the U.S."
Kagan urges Bush to "[take] tangible actions in the economic and
political spheres to express U.S. disapproval" of Putin's recent
moves. This may cost us Russia's help in the short term, but it is a risk
we must run if we are to obtain our long-term strategic goals.
|
 |